-
CCHR Releases Report Examining Electoral Processes and Democratic Practices in Cambodia
On this international day of democracy, the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR), a non-‐ aligned, independent, non-‐governmental organization that works to promote and protect democracy and respect for human rights throughout Cambodia, releases a report titled “Strengthening Electoral Processes and Democratic Practices in Cambodia: A Report on Forum on Elections and Democratic Space” (the “Report”).
Read More -
CCHR Releases Report Examining Electoral Processes and Democratic Practices in Cambodia
On this international day of democracy, the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR), a non-‐ aligned, independent, non-‐governmental organization that works to promote and protect democracy and respect for human rights throughout Cambodia, releases a report titled “Strengthening Electoral Processes and Democratic Practices in Cambodia: A Report on Forum on Elections and Democratic Space” (the “Report”).
Read More -
CCHR Releases Report Examining Electoral Processes and Democratic Practices in Cambodia
On this international day of democracy, the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR), a non-‐ aligned, independent, non-‐governmental organization that works to promote and protect democracy and respect for human rights throughout Cambodia, releases a report titled “Strengthening Electoral Processes and Democratic Practices in Cambodia: A Report on Forum on Elections and Democratic Space” (the “Report”).
Read More -
Report on Forum on Elections and Democratic Space
The Report is an output of the Forums on Elections and Democratic Space project (the “Project”) implemented by CCHR and supported by UNDP as part of its Strengthening Democracy and Electoral Processes Project. It presents information obtained through consultation with key stakeholders, data collected from four Forums on Elections and Democratic Space (the “Forums”) conducted in Battambang, Ratanakiri, Takeo and Phnom Penh between 21 October and 2 December 2010, and comments from stakeholders during a closing workshop in Phnom Penh on 8 December 2010, where data and information from the Project was presented (the “Closing Workshop”). The Report was written with the aim of providing the RGC, the MoI and other relevant stakeholders with an overview of key issues that were raised during the Forums and seeks to offer solutions for improvements in the identified areas.
Read More -
District and provincial authorities are not above the law
CCHR, LICADHO and CLEC condemn efforts on the part of Kampong Thom province and Sandan district officials to impose conditions on human rights activities above and beyond that provided for in law. Such conditions have no basis in law and any attempts to impose such conditions are in flagrant disregard of the human rights of the people of Kampong Thom province as well as others who travel to that province to participate in activities in the promotion and protection of human rights.
Read More -
District and provincial authorities are not above the law
CCHR, LICADHO and CLEC condemn efforts on the part of Kampong Thom province and Sandan district officials to impose conditions on human rights activities above and beyond that provided for in law. Such conditions have no basis in law and any attempts to impose such conditions are in flagrant disregard of the human rights of the people of Kampong Thom province as well as others who travel to that province to participate in activities in the promotion and protection of human rights.
Read More -
The Law on the Press 1995 (the “Press Law”)
The Cambodian Center for Human Rights (“CCHR”)has classified the Press Law yellow on the basis that it contains a number of positive provisions which, in theory, afford vital protection to those working in the media, yet some of its provisions are either vague, undefined or contradictory, and should therefore be reviewed and amended. First and foremost, any references to criminal law should be clarified for the benefit of the courts.
Read More -
The Law on the Press 1995 (the “Press Law”)
The Cambodian Center for Human Rights (“CCHR”)has classified the Press Law yellow on the basis that it contains a number of positive provisions which, in theory, afford vital protection to those working in the media, yet some of its provisions are either vague, undefined or contradictory, and should therefore be reviewed and amended. First and foremost, any references to criminal law should be clarified for the benefit of the courts.
Read More -
The Law on the Press 1995 (the “Press Law”)
The Cambodian Center for Human Rights (“CCHR”)has classified the Press Law yellow on the basis that it contains a number of positive provisions which, in theory, afford vital protection to those working in the media, yet some of its provisions are either vague, undefined or contradictory, and should therefore be reviewed and amended. First and foremost, any references to criminal law should be clarified for the benefit of the courts.
Read More -
The Law on the Press 1995 (the “Press Law”)
The Cambodian Center for Human Rights (“CCHR”)has classified the Press Law yellow on the basis that it contains a number of positive provisions which, in theory, afford vital protection to those working in the media, yet some of its provisions are either vague, undefined or contradictory, and should therefore be reviewed and amended. First and foremost, any references to criminal law should be clarified for the benefit of the courts.
Read More -
The Law on the Press 1995 (the “Press Law”)
The Cambodian Center for Human Rights (“CCHR”) has classified the Press Law yellow on the basis that it contains a number of positive provisions which, in theory, afford vital protection to those working in the media, yet some of its provisions are either vague, undefined or contradictory, and should therefore be reviewed and amended. First and foremost, any references to criminal law should be clarified for the benefit of the courts.
Read More -
District and provincial authorities are not above the law
CCHR, LICADHO and CLEC condemn efforts on the part of Kampong Thom province and Sandan district officials to impose conditions on human rights activities above and beyond that provided for in law. Such conditions have no basis in law and any attempts to impose such conditions are in flagrant disregard of the human rights of the people of Kampong Thom province as well as others who travel to that province to participate in activities in the promotion and protection of human rights.
Read More
Generously Supported by
